<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creative Commons License your tweets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dorkage.net/blog/2009/03/08/creative-commons-license-your-tweets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dorkage.net/blog/2009/03/08/creative-commons-license-your-tweets/</link>
	<description>überblog geek life, humour, insights, and meta stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:54:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://dorkage.net/blog/2009/03/08/creative-commons-license-your-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkage.net/?p=621#comment-1476</guid>
		<description>Efusjon:  Yes indeed, no one to my knowledge has figured out a good way to monetize the tweet stream, but just in case someone does I don&#039;t want anyone making money off what I created.  

I believe the tweet stream has value to twitter as a huge datamine.  If they can link up an individual&#039;s interest mined from their tweets to relevant product they might be able to deliver good ad value, either on twitter or on other sites.  

There are already lotsa things that take tweetstreams and remix &#039;em.  I don&#039;t think they consider the CC status of the source streams though.  Only when they actually start making serious $$ will anyone care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Efusjon:  Yes indeed, no one to my knowledge has figured out a good way to monetize the tweet stream, but just in case someone does I don&#8217;t want anyone making money off what I created.  </p>
<p>I believe the tweet stream has value to twitter as a huge datamine.  If they can link up an individual&#8217;s interest mined from their tweets to relevant product they might be able to deliver good ad value, either on twitter or on other sites.  </p>
<p>There are already lotsa things that take tweetstreams and remix &#8216;em.  I don&#8217;t think they consider the CC status of the source streams though.  Only when they actually start making serious $$ will anyone care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Efusjon</title>
		<link>http://dorkage.net/blog/2009/03/08/creative-commons-license-your-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>Efusjon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkage.net/?p=621#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>It will be hard to monetize tweet streams because so many tweets require contextual knowledge about the domain or what the author has been saying in previous days.

Now I&#039;m waiting for someone to take the CC content, remix it, and send it back through CC.  Kind of like a continuous tweet feedback loop.  All you need is a few dozen folks to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be hard to monetize tweet streams because so many tweets require contextual knowledge about the domain or what the author has been saying in previous days.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m waiting for someone to take the CC content, remix it, and send it back through CC.  Kind of like a continuous tweet feedback loop.  All you need is a few dozen folks to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://dorkage.net/blog/2009/03/08/creative-commons-license-your-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1131</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkage.net/?p=621#comment-1131</guid>
		<description>That is what the post is explaining, it prevents commercial exploitation by making it explicit what u can and can&#039;t do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is what the post is explaining, it prevents commercial exploitation by making it explicit what u can and can&#8217;t do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheap cars</title>
		<link>http://dorkage.net/blog/2009/03/08/creative-commons-license-your-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheap cars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkage.net/?p=621#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>Is it really got to do about the re-publishing stuff that it wants to avoid cuz I really am not able to exactly figure out that real idea of having a license in the first place...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really got to do about the re-publishing stuff that it wants to avoid cuz I really am not able to exactly figure out that real idea of having a license in the first place&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: personal injury lawyers</title>
		<link>http://dorkage.net/blog/2009/03/08/creative-commons-license-your-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>personal injury lawyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkage.net/?p=621#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>I have already read a lot of story about tweet here. Thanks for this new one. Actually license to your tweets is what make it clear for your authors and publishers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have already read a lot of story about tweet here. Thanks for this new one. Actually license to your tweets is what make it clear for your authors and publishers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://dorkage.net/blog/2009/03/08/creative-commons-license-your-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkage.net/?p=621#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>Well, Twitter is a popular topic, it brings the subscriber numbers up in the short term.   And besides it&#039;s so easy to goof around with it pretty much anyone can do it.  But you are right about one thing I need to get serious and write some more long-tail hard core posts -- those ones perform best over time.  A good hard core post is worth a dozen of the little fluffy ones.  :)  This particular post is really more about the CC license than it is about Twitter.  The application I refer to is pretty trivial.  But thanks for your vote for the serious stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Twitter is a popular topic, it brings the subscriber numbers up in the short term.   And besides it&#8217;s so easy to goof around with it pretty much anyone can do it.  But you are right about one thing I need to get serious and write some more long-tail hard core posts &#8212; those ones perform best over time.  A good hard core post is worth a dozen of the little fluffy ones.  <img src='http://dorkage.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   This particular post is really more about the CC license than it is about Twitter.  The application I refer to is pretty trivial.  But thanks for your vote for the serious stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meeting rooms edinburgh</title>
		<link>http://dorkage.net/blog/2009/03/08/creative-commons-license-your-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>meeting rooms edinburgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkage.net/?p=621#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>It’s nice that this blog spends so much time on topics about Twitter, but it tends to go a bit into the extreme. It almost seems that one out of three posts is about Twitter (or a company who uses the Api of Twitter). We can almost call it the NextTwitterWeb.com or something like that… Disappoints me a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s nice that this blog spends so much time on topics about Twitter, but it tends to go a bit into the extreme. It almost seems that one out of three posts is about Twitter (or a company who uses the Api of Twitter). We can almost call it the NextTwitterWeb.com or something like that… Disappoints me a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

